"love Is Love" Until It Doesn't Include Sex

"you've already left kudos here. :)" ok and I'll leave some more. You got a problem? Because in my opinion, this work is so good and the author totally deserves it

I miss the time when someone had just posted whole movies and shows on youtube for free, like not copyrighted or anything just the whole thing in one video

I remember when I watched the whole of star wars rebels at my grandmas on youtube years ago, you can't do that anymore (at least not very efficiently) I've also watched barbie movies and a whole bunch of other stuff on yt

I do understand why they're copyrighted now though, don't get me wrong, but I can still miss those times

every episode I rewatch, I don't remember what happens based on the name, but in the first five minutes of the ep something makes me go "ohhh, this one. I remember this." e.g. I just started 01x11 'scarecrow' and immediately when I saw the forest I remembered what happens, like the ep flashed through in my mind.

sooo I figured it out yay! they're supposed to be ITE-artworks.

here's the finished product :)

it's named 'taivas ja luomakunta' or 'heaven and creation/cosmos' I think in English. but the translation doesn't have the same feel as the og to me

close-ups bc I'm kinda proud abt how they turned out:

ofc I had to make one of them an angel (I was watching spn while crafting these so). the wings were so much work and frustrating bc they're not the same shape and turned out different than I hoped but they're fine ig. plus the wire coloured my fingers grey so that was fun :D

and the reference painting for anyone interested. Taistelevat metsot (the Fighting capercaillies, 1886) by Ferdinand von Wright

what on earth am I doing with these? they've got to be done by thursday bc it's the last class of the course and I've literally got no clue or plan on what they're gonna be. gotta love art classes :D

(ignore my messy table lol)

speaking of, I just remembered I have an art acc too lol (but I'll be posting my art on here too whenever I actually finish something):

https://www.instagram.com/yooniedae?igsh=MW4xMWRjZmV6aGV6Mg==

behind every hot girl there is unhealthy, slightly concerning, spiritual connection to harry potter’s dead parents dead friend group

so I finished watching supernatural a few days ago and now I understand why people said "f the finale" bc what was that?? why? why did they do that??

on another note I started watching the show again bc ofc and it feels so nostalgic, I can also notice how much more like grandiose (idk if that's the right word, dunno how to explain it either) the show got by s15, the cases are so simple and they're so young in s1

Nie Huaisang is such a character. He can faint on command. The character guide in the novel describes him as a dandy and lists his weapons as saber (ostensibly) and crying (actually). He stalked a canary for several days and then sneaked it into class. He collects porn and shares it with his friends. He's in a sword wizard society and his clan in particular is known for their blades but he never once has a fight scene. His characteristic accessory is a paper fan. He failed summer camp twice. He formed a Golden Core nearly a decade later than everyone else his age. When his brother was killed he set in motion a several years long revenge scheme that involved both careful planning and insane improv. He built a reputation on not knowing anything. He threw himself on his brother's killer weeping and saying "if you don't help me I'm killing myself in front or you." Truly who is doing it like him

I know I used mcr as the template but this is true for like thirty bands someone help me

The way most autism literature describes "literal interpretation" is often not at all similar to how I experience it. Teenage me even thought I couldn't be autistic because I've always been able to learn metaphors easily.

In fact, I love wordplay of all kinds. Teenage me was fascinated to learn all the types of figurative language there are in poetry and literature.

But paperwork and questionnaires are hard, because there's so much they don't state clearly. Or they don't leave room for enough nuance.

"List all the jobs you've had, with start and end dates." What if I don't remember the exact day or month? Is the year enough?

"Have you been suffering from blurred vision?" Well, if I take off my glasses the whole world is blurred, but I'm fairly sure that's not what the intake form at the optometrist is asking.

Or the infamous (and infuriatingly stereotypical) "Would you rather go to a library or a party?" What sort of party? Where? Who's there? I work at a library. Am I currently at the library for work or pleasure? Does it have a good collection?

It's not common figures of speech that confound me. It's ambiguity, in situations that aren't supposed to be ambiguous.

The three-ring binder is the apex of book technology, by the way. All the advantages of a codex, plus you can add, remove, and reorder pages at will - pages which you can furthermore protect from damage in transparent sleeves, and store commentaries, notes, and other paratextual addenda behind them without obscuring the primary content. Truly the queen of codices. Reblog if you love the three-ring binder.